|
Post by splamzloard on Jan 21, 2012 16:43:29 GMT -5
And here is the quote: "Added jungle biome (requires a new world) with new tree and leaf types"
|
|
|
Post by FlamingDragon96 on Jan 21, 2012 16:44:25 GMT -5
ok, but we could mess with the map and add a jungle in
|
|
|
Post by Clue314 on Jan 21, 2012 16:53:12 GMT -5
But wait! Thats a snapshot, a preview, they may yet put it in the generators when it becomes REAL Minecraft.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingDragon96 on Jan 21, 2012 18:14:25 GMT -5
Hmmm... this might be true
|
|
|
Post by ashtheking on Jan 21, 2012 18:37:31 GMT -5
I could probably just mod it in, it's not that hard to add an already existing biome class.
|
|
|
Post by catplanetcatplanet on Jan 21, 2012 18:49:45 GMT -5
But as it is Ash's server he should make it. He already has made one on MC Forums, remember? I don't know if one on Planet Minecraft will make a difference. Also, I agree that we might be getting the wrong sorts of people through this. Just look at the thread for Ash's Dragons Reborn mod; I personally don't want 20 people with grammar like Clue's and names like 'yoker the ba.stard.
|
|
|
Post by Clue314 on Jan 21, 2012 18:50:28 GMT -5
I take offense.
|
|
|
Post by bloberis on Jan 21, 2012 20:27:15 GMT -5
There is never a thing as too many buildings in minecraft. Though I will say building quality needs to be stepped up a little. Not that anything is really bad, but there are places that could be better.
|
|
|
Post by ashtheking on Jan 21, 2012 20:45:32 GMT -5
@blob, you obviously never saw Nova.
|
|
|
Post by bloberis on Jan 21, 2012 21:03:41 GMT -5
I did, and it didn't have the problem of too many buildings, it had the problem of too many bad buildings.
|
|
|
Post by purelamb on Jan 21, 2012 21:10:52 GMT -5
Nova had a small population compared to the number of pointless buildings.
|
|
|
Post by catplanetcatplanet on Jan 21, 2012 21:12:09 GMT -5
Agree completely. I like Nova much better than the current human city.
|
|
|
Post by purelamb on Jan 21, 2012 21:16:21 GMT -5
Nova did have its charm can't argue with that.
|
|